<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Howto: Find Regression Windows Through Manual Binary Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/</link>
	<description>Tracking developments in Mozilla Thunderbird builds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Rumbling Edge :: Talk at Outblaze, Hong Kong</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4836</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rumbling Edge :: Talk at Outblaze, Hong Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-4836</guid>
		<description>[...] particular, I was told that my HOWTO find a manual regression window blogpost was particularly useful. (Drop me a quick email if any of my posts are interesting, OK?  My email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] particular, I was told that my HOWTO find a manual regression window blogpost was particularly useful. (Drop me a quick email if any of my posts are interesting, OK?  My email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Kwong</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3717</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Kwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-3717</guid>
		<description>@Nomis101: Thanks for the headsup!

@Peter: I agree, so I chose to wait 10-15 mins instead to get the builds off FTP. :)

That said, it could be due to my geographical location, though Mozilla FTPs probably are global. :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nomis101: Thanks for the headsup!</p>
<p>@Peter: I agree, so I chose to wait 10-15 mins instead to get the builds off FTP. <img src='http://www.rumblingedge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That said, it could be due to my geographical location, though Mozilla FTPs probably are global. :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3716</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-3716</guid>
		<description>I found the slow download speed from the Mozilla FTP to also be quite limiting. I wonder if that can be improved somehow for people doing QA who are not near Mozilla Hq.

@Simon, @Gary: &#124;hg bisect&#124; works nicely. But if you don&#039;t already have a clue where the error is the recompilations will make the whole process even slower than downloading. (And if you rebuild only partly, it may be broken at times.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the slow download speed from the Mozilla FTP to also be quite limiting. I wonder if that can be improved somehow for people doing QA who are not near Mozilla Hq.</p>
<p>@Simon, @Gary: |hg bisect| works nicely. But if you don&#8217;t already have a clue where the error is the recompilations will make the whole process even slower than downloading. (And if you rebuild only partly, it may be broken at times.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomis101</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3714</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomis101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-3714</guid>
		<description>It looks like &#124;hg bisect&#124; is the same than &#124;git bisect&#124; 
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BisectExtension</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like |hg bisect| is the same than |git bisect|<br />
<a href="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BisectExtension" rel="nofollow">http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BisectExtension</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Kwong</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3702</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Kwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-3702</guid>
		<description>@Simon, I know hg has &#124;hg bisect&#124; but I&#039;m not sure whether it&#039;s the equivalent of &#124;git bisect&#124; though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon, I know hg has |hg bisect| but I&#8217;m not sure whether it&#8217;s the equivalent of |git bisect| though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3700</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-3700</guid>
		<description>Please also check out the following discussion in the newsgroups. Would be nice to have such a feature for the QAC extension:

http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.quality/browse_thread/thread/c6475e51bbb6c618</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please also check out the following discussion in the newsgroups. Would be nice to have such a feature for the QAC extension:</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.quality/browse_thread/thread/c6475e51bbb6c618" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.quality/browse_thread/thread/c6475e51bbb6c618</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>Does hg provide some kind of support for an automatic binary search, like &#039;git bisect&#039; does? If so, and if you can test for the bug automatically, then this kind of thing becomes an awful lot easier...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does hg provide some kind of support for an automatic binary search, like &#8216;git bisect&#8217; does? If so, and if you can test for the bug automatically, then this kind of thing becomes an awful lot easier&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorus</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2009/02/24/howto-find-regression-windows-through-manual-binary-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=1229#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>What i do when searching a regression window, is that i also try to speed up exponentially when looking back. Each time doubling the jump i make. In your situation that would probably meand i skipped Shredder Alpha 3 and Shredder Alpha 1, but once i found the bug in 2.0.0.19 i would have checked Shredder Alpha 1 anyway to half the range again :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What i do when searching a regression window, is that i also try to speed up exponentially when looking back. Each time doubling the jump i make. In your situation that would probably meand i skipped Shredder Alpha 3 and Shredder Alpha 1, but once i found the bug in 2.0.0.19 i would have checked Shredder Alpha 1 anyway to half the range again <img src='http://www.rumblingedge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.441 seconds -->
