<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007-05-11 Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rumblingedge.com/2007/05/12/2007-05-11-thunderbird-2004-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2007/05/12/2007-05-11-thunderbird-2004-builds/</link>
	<description>Tracking developments in Mozilla Thunderbird builds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Kwong</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2007/05/12/2007-05-11-thunderbird-2004-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Kwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 08:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=764#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>&quot;The next release version number will at least be 2.0.0.4. As Scott MacGregor goes, &#039;I think we should sync up to the latest firefox release (even if we aren&#039;t going to ship a tbird 2.0.0.4. I believe that&#039;s what we do with 1.5.0.x).&#039;&quot;

Posted 21 April 2007 at this blog.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/rumblingedge/archives/2007/04/20070419_thunderbird_2004_builds.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/rumblingedge/archives/2007/04/20070419_thunderbird_2004_builds.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The next release version number will at least be 2.0.0.4. As Scott MacGregor goes, &#8216;I think we should sync up to the latest firefox release (even if we aren&#8217;t going to ship a tbird 2.0.0.4. I believe that&#8217;s what we do with 1.5.0.x).&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Posted 21 April 2007 at this blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/rumblingedge/archives/2007/04/20070419_thunderbird_2004_builds.html" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/rumblingedge/archives/2007/04/20070419_thunderbird_2004_builds.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2007/05/12/2007-05-11-thunderbird-2004-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 13:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=764#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Thunderbird 2.0.0.4?  What the hell?  What happened to 2.0.0.1, 2.0.0.2 or 2.0.0.3?  Did I miss something?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird 2.0.0.4?  What the hell?  What happened to 2.0.0.1, 2.0.0.2 or 2.0.0.3?  Did I miss something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.413 seconds -->
