<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird 1.5 RC 1 Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/11/05/thunderbird-15-rc-1-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/11/05/thunderbird-15-rc-1-available/</link>
	<description>Tracking developments in Mozilla Thunderbird builds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ihar `Philips` Filipau</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/11/05/thunderbird-15-rc-1-available/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Ihar `Philips` Filipau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=590#comment-930</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132&lt;/a&gt;


It is sufficient to recieve one mail with *many* recipients and/or *many* attachments to start considering this a bug.


I know people how run announcement mail-lists and recipients list can run into *hundreds* names.


This is very serious usability problem. Corner cases might be handled poorly - but still they must be handled.


P.S. Attachments problem are even more serious. List of recipients can be somehow poorly seen with &#039;View Source&#039;, while attachements cannot be seen that way. And at moment &#039;Save/Detach All&#039; feature is broken.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132</a></p>
<p>It is sufficient to recieve one mail with *many* recipients and/or *many* attachments to start considering this a bug.</p>
<p>I know people how run announcement mail-lists and recipients list can run into *hundreds* names.</p>
<p>This is very serious usability problem. Corner cases might be handled poorly &#8211; but still they must be handled.</p>
<p>P.S. Attachments problem are even more serious. List of recipients can be somehow poorly seen with &#8216;View Source&#8217;, while attachements cannot be seen that way. And at moment &#8216;Save/Detach All&#8217; feature is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theefool</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/11/05/thunderbird-15-rc-1-available/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>theefool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=590#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Bah!

This is more of a feature, then a bug.  A blocker would be closer to something actually breaking thunderbird.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah!</p>
<p>This is more of a feature, then a bug.  A blocker would be closer to something actually breaking thunderbird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ihar `Philips` Filipau</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/11/05/thunderbird-15-rc-1-available/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Ihar `Philips` Filipau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=590#comment-928</guid>
		<description>This is one (which must be actually blocker)

&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132&lt;/a&gt;

is still open. Open for *TWO* years.

No comments. Needless to say, I had hopes for Tb.
Thou It is still impossible to recommend it over M$ Outlook.

P.S. Fix wasn&#039;t even around 1.5 - makeing it a call for 2.0. So people will have to wait for fix another 1.5-2 years? Ridiculous.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one (which must be actually blocker)</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223132</a></p>
<p>is still open. Open for *TWO* years.</p>
<p>No comments. Needless to say, I had hopes for Tb.<br />
Thou It is still impossible to recommend it over M$ Outlook.</p>
<p>P.S. Fix wasn&#8217;t even around 1.5 &#8211; makeing it a call for 2.0. So people will have to wait for fix another 1.5-2 years? Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.445 seconds -->

