<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird 1.0.1 RC is out!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/03/10/thunderbird-101-rc-is-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/03/10/thunderbird-101-rc-is-out/</link>
	<description>Tracking developments in Mozilla Thunderbird builds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/03/10/thunderbird-101-rc-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=556#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this is useful info, but an install over 1.0 on Win2000 went without a problem.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this is useful info, but an install over 1.0 on Win2000 went without a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tr</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/03/10/thunderbird-101-rc-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>tr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=556#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but Thunderbird just isn&#039;t ready for primetime yet. There are crashers and hangers that no developer ever had a look at:

-- EDITED because URL is too long. Search on bugzilla instead. --

or bug 272729 or many other bugs filed against Thunderbird. If the mozilla foundation wants to abandon the suite they first have to make the alternatives worthful contenders. Firefox is there for most people and for some not but Thunderbird really has a lot of work pending.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but Thunderbird just isn&#8217;t ready for primetime yet. There are crashers and hangers that no developer ever had a look at:</p>
<p>&#8211; EDITED because URL is too long. Search on bugzilla instead. &#8211;</p>
<p>or bug 272729 or many other bugs filed against Thunderbird. If the mozilla foundation wants to abandon the suite they first have to make the alternatives worthful contenders. Firefox is there for most people and for some not but Thunderbird really has a lot of work pending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozjason</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblingedge.com/2005/03/10/thunderbird-101-rc-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>ozjason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblingedge.com/?p=556#comment-850</guid>
		<description>For any interested OS X users, I&#039;ve built an optimized G4 version of this. Link and info here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=225661&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=225661&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any interested OS X users, I&#8217;ve built an optimized G4 version of this. Link and info here:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=225661" rel="nofollow">http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=225661</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.410 seconds -->

